Cite
Kriech AJ, Emmel C, Osborn LV, et al. Errata to "Side-by-Side Comparison of Field Monitoring Methods for Hot Bitumen Emission Exposures: The German BGIA Method 6305, the U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method" [JOEH 7:712-725, 2010]. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011;8(9):D92-D96doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.602948.
Kriech, A. J., Emmel, C., Osborn, L. V., Breuer, D., Redman, A. P., Hoeber, D., Bochmann, F., & Ruehl, R. (2011). Errata to "Side-by-Side Comparison of Field Monitoring Methods for Hot Bitumen Emission Exposures: The German BGIA Method 6305, the U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method" [JOEH 7:712-725, 2010]. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 8(9), D92-D96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2011.602948
Kriech, Anthony J, et al. "Errata to "Side-by-Side Comparison of Field Monitoring Methods for Hot Bitumen Emission Exposures: The German BGIA Method 6305, the U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method" [JOEH 7:712-725, 2010]." Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene vol. 8,9 (2011): D92-D96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2011.602948
Kriech AJ, Emmel C, Osborn LV, Breuer D, Redman AP, Hoeber D, Bochmann F, Ruehl R. Errata to "Side-by-Side Comparison of Field Monitoring Methods for Hot Bitumen Emission Exposures: The German BGIA Method 6305, the U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method" [JOEH 7:712-725, 2010]. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 Sep;8(9):D92-D96. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.602948. PMID: 28094692.
Copy
Download .nbib